Regulatory Sandboxes and the EU AI Act: Accelerating Medical Device Innovation
Jan 20, 2026
•
Global Research Policy Group
How the 2026 mandatory national AI sandboxes are creating safe pathways for the deployment of high-risk AI medical solutions.
The technical structure of the sandbox involves a three-phase lifecycle: Support, Implementation, and Knowledge Sharing. During the Support phase, national authorities and panels of experts provide domain-specific guidance on fulfilling the requirements of the AI Act, such as data quality standards and cybersecurity resilience. The Implementation phase allows for supervised testing, often utilizing 'Testing and Experimentation Facilities' (TEFs) to provide high-quality datasets for validation. Crucially, the sandbox allows for the processing of personal data for public interest projects—such as disease prediction or clinical triage—provided that the data remains secure and siloed. At the conclusion, the authority provides an 'Exit Report' and 'Written Proof' of the activities, documentation that providers can then use to accelerate their formal market entry through notified bodies.
Beyond legal certainty, the sandbox serves as a 'Regulatory Learning Lab.' Authorities use the findings from sandbox projects to refine their understanding of emerging risks and to update evidence-based policies. This 'Co-Creation' of governance ensures that regulation does not stifle innovation but rather guides it toward trustworthy outcomes. For the 2026 innovation leader, participating in a sandbox is a strategic move that significantly reduces market barriers and builds institutional credibility with funders and clinicians. As other regions look to replicate this model, the EU's network of sandboxes is establishing a global blueprint for the responsible deployment of life-critical artificial intelligence.
Sources: European Commission: EU AI Act Article 57 and 58 Guidance; EUSAiR Project: Roadmap for AI Regulatory Sandboxes; Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) Implementation Tracker.